Wednesday, November 19, 2014

PDS Clinical Lesson Reflection (11/12/14)

For my clinical science lesson, my cooperating teacher and I decided that it would be best to continue finishing the unit we have been working on thus far this semester. In our kindergarten classroom, we have been discussing the difference between living and nonliving organisms, the necessities all living things need, the anatomy of plants, and how different animals move. For the lesson I implemented on Wednesday, November 12, I selected the following standard to guide my lesson: K-LS1-1 Use observations to describe patterns of what plants and animals (including humans) need to survive. I came up with two objectives for this lesson that include: students will be able to distinguish between the different life stages of a plant, and students will be able to identify the different parts of a plant. These two objectives correlated with the science workbook pages completed during this class.
At the beginning of my lesson, I asked the students to recall what we talked about during the last science lesson. Students were very attentive and told me how we talked about what plants and animals need to live. I applauded the students for remember what we did a week prior to this lesson implementation and related this information to that day’s goals. I briefly recapped what the students said and played a kid-friendly video explaining the life cycle of a plant. I paused the video a single time to ask children a question on what happened to the seeds once they were “hidden” underground. The students were able to tell me that the seeds started to grow into plants. I praised them for coming to that conclusion and continued the video. At the end of the video, I asked the students what happened. All of the students looked at me as if I had a third eye, but told me from beginning to end of what happened throughout the video. I was very pleased to see how the repetition of this standard has paid off. The video was then related back to the day’s objectives. Before moving into the next section of my lesson plan, I went over some crucial vocabulary with the students.
Even though our class has discussed what plants need to grow and survive, labeling a diagram of a plant was a new concept to these kindergartners. I had the students help me sound out each of the following words: flower, stem, roots, and leaf. This was the integration of literacy into my science lesson (letter sounds/phonemic awareness). I recapped where these parts were found on a plant and continued on with completing our large group activity. For the first workbook page, we, as a large group, completed drawings of the different life stages of a plant. I selected students to help generate ideas of which illustration would be listed there; I also tied this into the growth and development of humans, and similar activity we completed a few lessons prior. Students were able to come up with three main life stages for the plant, including the seeds being planted, a baby plant emerging, and finally, a full-grown adult plant. I made sure to walk around the room and ask students explain to me why we went in this particular order. Many children referred back to the video we just watched, while others remembered talking about the different plant stages from previous science lessons.
                After I made sure that everyone correctly drew in their plant life stages, we continued onto the shared practice. During this time, I felt very confident that I was doing a good job with my passing, checking for student understanding, and activating the student’s prior knowledge. Just from looking at their work samples, I could tell that even some of our struggling students were understanding this concept. Seeing these results boosted my confidence in knowing that I was effectively teaching the material correctly. As we moved onto the shared practice, students were told to work in their table teams on the new vocabulary introduced at the beginning of the lesson. Before the students started to work in their groups, I made sure that each child pointed to each word as we read it together. We did this for the following words: flower, stem, roots, and leaf. We have discussed different parts of a plant before, but listing these terms on a diagram was unfamiliar to the students. I wanted to use this as a shared practice activity so that the children could help one another out. To show me when groups were done, I told them to put their pencil on their nose. As I was observing the children work, I saw how everyone resorted to me for questions rather than each other. These students have never participated in a share practice, so this made me question my teaching abilities. Even though I reminded the students to work together, they only wanted my input, which defeats the purpose of having a “shared practice” section in a lesson plan. After constant reminders, the students finally talked amongst themselves to go over which word they connected to each part of the plant. As a group, we went over the answers as I called individual students from each table team to draw a line from a word to the corresponding image on the SMART board. All students did this activity correctly, too. I made sure to walk around to each table and check their worksheet pages before moving on to the independent practice portion of this lesson.
                My checklist to assess the student’s individual practice was utilized during this final activity. We went over the life cycle of a plant via the introductory video and by completing illustrations as a class, but now it was time to see how many students were able to complete this task independently. The children were instructed to label four images using the numbers 1, 2, 3, and 4 to indicate which picture came first, second, and so on. While each child was filling out their worksheet, I was walking around to each table recording whether or not they were accurately able to label these images. Of the 22 students I had in class, four of them were not able to effectively label the life stages of a plant independently. I saw that all four students mixed up the second and third illustrations, which could be challenging for a young child to detect. Overall, there was an 82% objective success rate in the lesson I taught. I was happy with these results, but was disappointed that four students did not meet this lesson’s objective of distinguishing between the different life stages of a plant.
                Overall, I feel that I did a successful job in assessing the students throughout the lesson. I documented their individual work as well as checking for understanding through the use of gestures and questions. When looking over and consulting my CT on my performance, she told me that I did a good job activating the children’s prior knowledge, that I grasped their attention with the video, that I paused to ask a question, that I utilized good visuals to indicate when the children completed an activity, and that the behavior of the students was good, which translated to an appropriate paced lesson. However, not everything I did was sunshine and rainbows. A few areas of growth my CT noted included pausing an additional time during the video to explain how the day and night scene indicated time passing (this concept may have been lost on a few students), having the students working independently during the “shared practice” aspect of my lesson and then having the students share their answers with their teammates when everyone was completed, and going over how different numbers represent a sequence, as seen in the independent practice portion of my lesson (1 means the first, 2 means the next, etc.). Overall, I would say that I am proud of how far I have come with teaching in front of my kindergarten students. I was pleased to see the enthusiasm and excitement presented on their faces, as well as how engaged each student was. Although there are areas of growth I will improve upon, I am proud to see my CT’s observations and strengths I exhibited during this time. This was a very atypical lesson plan setup, but I wanted to set it up this way to help with the overall organizational flow of the lesson. I wanted to be ambitious and try something new, such as the “shared practice” to see which students responded well to this adjustment. Although this did not go as expected, I do not regret organizing my lesson in this way. I feel that the change in format helped keep the student’s attention, as well as introducing a new grouping strategy to this classroom. I am excited to take these criticisms and improve upon them to exhibit more positive outcomes for the next lesson I teach at my clinical site.

Exceeds: Went over the word count and included a synopsis of the lesson I taught in my overall reflection. 

No comments:

Post a Comment